Key Insights from SAFe 4.0

I’m a big fan of Dean Leffingwell and his work on the Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe). He’s been bringing lean thinking to software development for some time now. I work in a massive IT organization that has identified SAFe as how we’d like to develop software going forward.

Listen for these key concepts in the video below.

  • The Customer and the Value Stream are key to the framework
  • Value streams are the central organizing construct for SAFe.
  • SAFe as a model, organizes around value, and this helps speed delivery
  • Funding value streams vs. funding Agile Release Trains (ARTs)
  • When Requirements are needed vs. the concept of Solution Intent
  • General purpose solutions vs. ‘bespoke’ solutions

Over the past few years, I have heard many software development professionals say things like, “It’s a pretty good concept, but it doesn’t work in the real world.” or “SAFe doesn’t account for Architecture or other enablers.” 

If you are in IT, you owe it to yourself to get up to speed not just on SAFe, but on the underlying lean thinking concepts that are driving it. If you don’t, you risk getting left behind both organizationally, and in your IT career.

Bob H – April 28, 2017


Key Links

Scaled Agile Framework home: http://www.scaledagileframework.com/

Lean-Agile Mindset Abstract: http://www.scaledagileframework.com/lean-agile-mindset/

Value Streams Abstract: http://www.scaledagileframework.com/value-streams/

Team Kanban Abstract: http://www.scaledagileframework.com/team-kanban/

 

Advertisements

Seeing Value in Everyday Work

Who is managing the value?

“Even though the people we manage are quite busy, the workflow itself is starting and stopping and starting and stopping.”

Alan Shalloway has a great, no nonsense way of communicating. This 7 minute video show why so many organizations have a disconnect between the work they are doing and the things that improve the quality and timeliness of their delivery. I’d love to hear your thoughts… does Al’s message ring true in your world? I know it sure does in mine! 🙂

Check out all the NetObjective videos at their YouTube channel

http://www.youtube.com/user/NetObjectives?feature=watch

http://www.netobjectives.com

Kaizen Principle: Bias for Action

from Mark Hamel’s Gemba Tales blog: http://kaizenfieldbook.com/marksblog/archives/821

Several days ago, during a health care value stream analysis, I was impressed with the team’s bias for action. Now we know that value stream mapping is typically a “paper” activity, but it was refreshing to see that one of the future state’s kaizen bursts, identified as a “just-do-it,” couldn’t wait. The team completed the just-do-it right before the wrap-up presentation. Outstanding!

Kaizen is founded on certain principles, one of which is a bias for action. This bias for action is largely a behavioral thing, but it can be facilitated by effective coaching, formal training, and the application of lean management systems and related visual controls that should absolutely scream for action.

  1. Think PDCA and SDCA, the basic scientific methods.
  2. Go to the gemba; observe and document reality.
  3. Ask “why?” five times to identify root causes.
  4. Be dissatisfied with the status quo.
  5. Kaizen what matters.
  6. Have a bias for action.
  7. Frequent, small incremental improvements drive big, sustainable improvements.
  8. Be like MacGyver; use creativity before capital.
  9. Kaizen is everyone’s job.
  10. No transformation without transformation leadership.

Plus – Do everything with humility and respect for the individual.

The combined dissatisfaction with the status quo (eyes for waste  “see” the current state and the ideal state) and the existence of explicit performance gaps that are targeted for closure (kaizen what matters) should be unbearable enough to drive action. And, our action should be focused on appropriately and economically (Macgyver was a creative cheapskate) addressing the root causes (5 why’s and PDCA thinking) and then sustaining the performance (SDCA).

So, I’ll leave you with another bias for action story, surprisingly also within a value stream analysis backdrop. Tony, the plant manager, was participating in a combined value stream analysis/plant lay-out/3P activity for a brand new line. As we developed pro forma standard work and were doing table top and plant floor simulations applying, among other things continuous flow, he had a eureka moment. Actually, I noticed that he was becoming quite agitated and then…he disappeared. Over an hour later, Tony returned. He informed the team that he couldn’t stand it when he realized that the same principles needed to be applied to existing lines. So, right away, he made sure that the other lines (granted, without standard work at the time) stop their evil batch and queue ways and go to single piece flow. By the next day, the old lines had demonstrated an 18% productivity improvement. Now, that’s bias for action!

By the way, there’s a good chance that Gemba Tales is looking like an HTML file – no pics, no nice looking template. That’s because my web host, Network Solutions has continued to have problems. They keep promising to fix it, but I’m feeling more and more that their last name should not be “Solutions.” Thanks for your patience

from Mark Hamel’s Gemba Tales blog: http://kaizenfieldbook.com/marksblog/archives/821